Notable Items:
Plaintiff: Charles and April Land
Defendant: Yamaha Motor Corporation
Venue: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Cicuit
Issue(s) Before the Court:
Plaintiff's Claim(s):
that the case is not barred because ... California law, which includes no statute of repose, governs the action (per Erie Doctrine
Defendant's Claim(s):
Indiana Statute of Repose bars the instant case.
Holding(s) and Disposition:
Held: District Court affirmed.
Disposition: none.
Material Facts:
- June 25, 1998, plaintiff attempted to start a Yamaha WaveRunner on Heritage Lake in Indiana.
- The WaveRunner exploded and caused Land permanent back injury.
- December 23, 1998, plaintiffs filed suit.
- More than 10 years after the WaveRunner was delivered to its first owner.
- Indiana Statute of Repose stipulates that product liability actions must be commenced within 10 years after delivery of the product to the first user or consumer.
- A full recounting of the facts is available below
Procedural History:
- District Court granted summary judgement in favor of the defendants holding that the suit was barred by Indiana Statute of Repose [Limitations].
- Appeal filed and considered by this court.
Rationale
Majority Opinion
- Indiana Statute of Repose stipulates that product liability actions must be commenced within 10 years after delivery of the product to the first user or consumer.
- Indiana applies a two-step conflicts anaylsis to choice-of-law rule.
- First: if the palce where the last event necessary to make the defendant liable (place of injury) is insignificant.
- If significant, the law of the state in which the triggering event occurred applies.
- Place of injury in the instant case is not insignficant...therefore we apply Indiana law.
- Therefore the Indiana Statute of Repose applies.
- A list of the material facts is available above
- A full description of the rationale is available below
Full Recounting of Facts
- June 25, 1998, plaintiff attempted to start a Yamaha WaveRunner on Heritage Lake in Indiana.
- The WaveRunner exploded and caused Land permanent back injury.
- Plaintiff's contend that the WaveRunner was defective in design, allowing gasoline fumes to accumulate inside the hull thereby creating the threat of explosion.
- December 23, 1998, plaintiffs filed suit.
- More than 10 years after the WaveRunner was delivered to its first owner.
- Indiana Statute of Repose stipulates that product liability actions must be commenced within 10 years after delivery of the product to the first user or consumer.
- A list of the material facts is available above
Majority Full Argument
- Indiana Statute of Repose stipulates that product liability actions must be commenced within 10 years after delivery of the product to the first user or consumer.
- Indiana applies a two-step conflicts anaylsis to choice-of-law rule.
- First: if the palce where the last event necessary to make the defendant liable (place of injury) is insignificant.
- If significant, the law of the state in which the triggering event occurred applies.
- If insignificant, court considers: 1) place where conduct causing the injury occurred; 2) residence or place of business of the parties; 3) place where the relationship is centered.
- Place of injury in the instant case is not insignficant...therefore we apply Indiana law.
- Occurrance in Indiana is not mere fortuity...resident of Indiana, owner resides in Indiana, stored in Indiana, choice-of-law analysis ends with step one.
- Therefore the Indiana Statute of Repose applies.
- A list of the material facts is available above
- The core of the rationale is available above